問題詳情
IV. Discourse
Section A
After decades of operating with impunity as one of the most powerful men in entertainment, Harvey Weinstein has been brought down by a flood of chilling sexual harassment and assault claims, more of which may yet come to light. Power seems to have been his noxious aphrodisiac. Power was why some women acceded and others clammed up, why his employees helped facilitate his assaults and why so many in Hollywood looked the other way for decades. Power was the means, the motive, and the cover-up. ___(30)__
Weinstein spent decades building his fiefdom on the grounds of a pervasive “see something, say nothing" culture of capitulation. But at the same time, and apparently beyond his view, women were inching their way toward greater social, political and professional power. ___(31)_. In the rubble of Weinstein's empire, we find artifacts divulging so much about our values, our culture and ourselves. The story they tell is one of stunning hypocrisy and of the slow grind of earth shifting beneath us.
Still, power differentials matter. Overt harassment may be increasingly kept in check, but sexual coercion and abuse have not been eradicated. They are simply more likely to be hidden from plain view—in an office with the door closed, in the corner of a company party, at what was supposed to be a working dinner, in a room at the Peninsula Beverly Hills hotel. It's no coincidence that harassment and even assault were pushed undercover at the same time more and more women entered previously male-dominated fields, rose to prominence and gained power in their own right.__(32)___. But only slightly. Across industries, there are still men so powerful, they seem untouchable.
Each of these high-profile cases echoes the last and accelerates the next. Toppling the first few titans was a heavy lift, and while it's still not easy, each successive predator seems to fall that much faster. Feminists have succeeded in getting sexual harassment and assault taken seriously enough to be career-ending. _(33)_. With each of these stories, you canimagine the newsroom dictates: Find the next Weinstein. At the same time, you hear women whisper: Should I speak out about my own Weinstein?
_(34)__. But since the story broke, everything was exposed under the sun. There has been a collective exhale among the women who finally spoke out. In the New Yorker, writer Ronan Farrow detailed additional accusations, including rape, and described the well-staffed machine that deceived young women into spending time alone with a man everyone knew was a predator. Weinstein was not a solo operator, and now his vast network of enablers is also falling under the scrutiny of the entertainers, journalists and activists who expect heads to roll. Amid the wave of allegations and outcry from other Hollywood luminaries, Weinstein was fired. The Weinstein Company's all-male board was divided on his fate. Within 48 hours, four board members had resigned.
Every woman knows these men. We've worked for them, loved them, married them, and raised them. We've watched their movies and read their books and cast ballots checking their names. Every woman also knows the pretty good men who aren't predators, but who intentionally or tacitly create the conditions for the predation, degradation or even just marginalization of women: the men who make up all-male boards and executive leadership, who don't want to create discomfort by challenging sexism from friends or co-workers, who hire and mentor and promote younger men, who go silent on "women's issues.” We are often quick to absolve them, and how could we not? _(35) . The men are supposed to be on our side, though—these men are the ones who break our hearts.
(AB) News organizations increasingly recognize that breaking these stories benefits both theirreputations and their bottom line—the first to get there sets the media narrative for days orweeks.
(AC) How fitting that it is their voices breaking the silence and shattering Hollywood's glasshouses. (AD) With more women in the room, and a few at the top, male workplace norms began tocrack.
(AE) And power is exactly what he has lost, in a downfall that spans two coasts, severalindustries and dozens of klieg-lit names. (BC) This growing cacophony of mostly female voices no doubt has the remaining Weinsteinof the world holding their breath.
(BD) Severing our ties with all of these men would require self-banishment to a remote cave, orat least expatriation to a radical commune.
30.
Section A
After decades of operating with impunity as one of the most powerful men in entertainment, Harvey Weinstein has been brought down by a flood of chilling sexual harassment and assault claims, more of which may yet come to light. Power seems to have been his noxious aphrodisiac. Power was why some women acceded and others clammed up, why his employees helped facilitate his assaults and why so many in Hollywood looked the other way for decades. Power was the means, the motive, and the cover-up. ___(30)__
Weinstein spent decades building his fiefdom on the grounds of a pervasive “see something, say nothing" culture of capitulation. But at the same time, and apparently beyond his view, women were inching their way toward greater social, political and professional power. ___(31)_. In the rubble of Weinstein's empire, we find artifacts divulging so much about our values, our culture and ourselves. The story they tell is one of stunning hypocrisy and of the slow grind of earth shifting beneath us.
Still, power differentials matter. Overt harassment may be increasingly kept in check, but sexual coercion and abuse have not been eradicated. They are simply more likely to be hidden from plain view—in an office with the door closed, in the corner of a company party, at what was supposed to be a working dinner, in a room at the Peninsula Beverly Hills hotel. It's no coincidence that harassment and even assault were pushed undercover at the same time more and more women entered previously male-dominated fields, rose to prominence and gained power in their own right.__(32)___. But only slightly. Across industries, there are still men so powerful, they seem untouchable.
Each of these high-profile cases echoes the last and accelerates the next. Toppling the first few titans was a heavy lift, and while it's still not easy, each successive predator seems to fall that much faster. Feminists have succeeded in getting sexual harassment and assault taken seriously enough to be career-ending. _(33)_. With each of these stories, you canimagine the newsroom dictates: Find the next Weinstein. At the same time, you hear women whisper: Should I speak out about my own Weinstein?
_(34)__. But since the story broke, everything was exposed under the sun. There has been a collective exhale among the women who finally spoke out. In the New Yorker, writer Ronan Farrow detailed additional accusations, including rape, and described the well-staffed machine that deceived young women into spending time alone with a man everyone knew was a predator. Weinstein was not a solo operator, and now his vast network of enablers is also falling under the scrutiny of the entertainers, journalists and activists who expect heads to roll. Amid the wave of allegations and outcry from other Hollywood luminaries, Weinstein was fired. The Weinstein Company's all-male board was divided on his fate. Within 48 hours, four board members had resigned.
Every woman knows these men. We've worked for them, loved them, married them, and raised them. We've watched their movies and read their books and cast ballots checking their names. Every woman also knows the pretty good men who aren't predators, but who intentionally or tacitly create the conditions for the predation, degradation or even just marginalization of women: the men who make up all-male boards and executive leadership, who don't want to create discomfort by challenging sexism from friends or co-workers, who hire and mentor and promote younger men, who go silent on "women's issues.” We are often quick to absolve them, and how could we not? _(35) . The men are supposed to be on our side, though—these men are the ones who break our hearts.
(AB) News organizations increasingly recognize that breaking these stories benefits both theirreputations and their bottom line—the first to get there sets the media narrative for days orweeks.
(AC) How fitting that it is their voices breaking the silence and shattering Hollywood's glasshouses. (AD) With more women in the room, and a few at the top, male workplace norms began tocrack.
(AE) And power is exactly what he has lost, in a downfall that spans two coasts, severalindustries and dozens of klieg-lit names. (BC) This growing cacophony of mostly female voices no doubt has the remaining Weinsteinof the world holding their breath.
(BD) Severing our ties with all of these men would require self-banishment to a remote cave, orat least expatriation to a radical commune.
30.
參考答案
無參考答案
內容推薦
- 【題組】(A) and (B) x (C) that (D)where
- 【題組】(A) humongous (B) incredulous (C) contumelious (D)languid
- 地價稅每年開徵一次,繳納期間為每年 11 月 1 日至 11月 30 日。關於地價稅的敘述,下列敘述何者正確?(A)為地方政府自行籌措的財源 (B)由中央政府課徵與支用的稅收(C)地方政府所屬
- Mandy's attractive new _____ was arranged by my sister's hair stylist.(A) carnage (B) c
- 若你是永靖鄉居民 ,要找當地民意代表陳情,請問找以下哪位最為適當? (A)永靖鄉長 (B)永靖鄉議員 (C)彰化縣長 (D)永靖鄉民代表。
- III. Semantic Filling Whether it's in a movie theater, on TV or on a computer screen, the v
- All babies are born with some natural smarts, but youngsters learn more about the world when this in
- It was a sweltering Saturday in London and the anger hung in the air like the heat. On June 17, 2017
- The new president was given _____ before the assembled residents as an approvaland acceptance fr
- Since the hospital beds in this local area have reached _____ point, the newarrrivals are forced
內容推薦
- 【題組】Which paragraph gives the most specific evidence in support of the author'sstatement in
- 【題組】Why does the author reference Dr. Seuss and his book Oh, The Places You'll Go! Inthe te
- 【題組】Why does the author mention the National Academy of Engineering challenge inlines 29-31? (A)
- 爸爸五月繳「所得稅」,媽媽十一月繳「地價稅」。請問,爸爸媽媽繳的稅,分別可對應下表的那些代號? (A)甲己 (B)甲丁 (C)丙戊 (D)丁己。
- 請依據附表回答下列問題:三種原子何者質量最大? (A)甲 (B)乙 (C)丙 (D)三者相等。
- 遺產稅及贈與稅自 106 年 5 月 12 日起改採 10%、15%、20%三級累進稅率,遺產稅未繳清前,不得分割遺產、交付遺贈或辦理移轉登記。請問:有關「遺產稅」的敘述,下列何者錯誤? (A
- 索取發票是避免商家逃漏「營業稅」及「營利事業所得稅」,若依課稅的對象來分析,兩者屬於何種類的稅?(A)財產稅、所得稅 (B)所得稅、所得稅 (C)銷售稅、財產稅 (D)銷售稅、所得稅。
- 有些建築物,例如醫院,會在一些特定地區入口處的門板或牆壁上,張貼如圖所示的圖案。此為國際通用的一個標誌,下列有關此標誌意義之敘述,何者正確? (A)此地區為發電機放置區 (B)此地區有緊急逃生設
- 有關「地方自治」的優點,下列何者錯誤?(A)地方自治是主權在民的根本,可以確保地方的主體性與自主性 (B)人民依法組織地方政府,可培養民主法治素養 (C)地方政府擁有完全自主的職權,不需任何的
- 下圖光滑機械中的細桿與滑輪重不計,欲提升物體 2 公分;至少須施力多少 kgw? (A)5 (B)10(C)20 (D)30 公斤重。
- 芬蘭聯合內閣由五個政黨組成,原任交通部長的馬林在最大黨社會民主黨黨籍議員投票中,以卅二比廿九票的些微差距擊敗黨內對手林特曼獲得提名,準備接替請辭的總理李納,卅四歲的她將成為全球最年輕的政府領導人。馬林
- 一繩波原先如下圖(一)所示,穩定向前傳送,經 0.2 秒後波形如圖(二),有關此週期波的敘述,何者正確? (A)波速 300 公分/秒 (B)波長 15 公分 (C)週期 1/20 秒 (D)頻
- 請依據附表回答下列問題:三種原子何者質量最大?【題組】承 21 題,表中哪些原子的化學性質可能是一樣的?(A)甲、乙 (B)乙、丙 (C)甲、丙 (D)三者相同。
- 下列哪一個溫度較高? (A)274K (B)34°F (C)4°C (D)77K的液態氮 (E) − 78°C的乾冰
- 有關物體「熱能」的敘述,下列何者正確? (A)物體內原子、分子間的位能稱為熱能 (B)物體內原子、分子的動能稱為熱能 (C)熱能亦稱為內能 (D)兩物體接觸,熱能由質量多者流向質量少者 (E)
- 如果我們只考慮發電方式而暫時不考慮其他因素,請問下列何者對於空氣汙染最為嚴重? (A)水力發電 (B)風力發電 (C)太陽能發電 (D)火力發電 (E)地熱發電
- 如附圖所示,地面上有一個 5 公斤的靜止物體,若施以 10 公斤重垂直向上的固定拉力,則該物體於受力期間的加速度為多少 m∕s2?(g=10 m∕s2) (A) 2 (B) 10 (C) 20
- 有關金屬元素的通性,下列哪一項敘述錯誤? (A)常溫常壓下,都以固態存在 (B)大部分具有延性及展性 (C)大部分具有銀灰色的金屬光澤 (D)皆為電與熱的良導體。
- 有關元素的敘述,下列何者錯誤? (A)元素可概分為金屬元素與非金屬元素 (B)金屬元素為電與熱的良導體 (C)石墨是由矽元素構成的,可以導電 (D)銅和鋅製成的合金稱之為黃銅。
- 承 21 題,表中哪些原子的化學性質可能是一樣的?【題組】承 22 題,這是依據何者所做出的推斷?(A)質子數(B)中子數 (C)質量數 (D)電子數。
- 一大氣壓下,若將液態空氣緩慢加熱,將會發現氮氣比氧氣先沸騰。試問下列說法何者較合理?甲.氮氣的熔點比氧氣低;乙.氧氣的沸點比氮氣高;丙.液態空氣是混合物。 (A)甲乙 (B)甲丙 (C)乙丙
- 附圖電路中,已知通過電池的總電流為 6 A,通過 4Ω 電阻的電流為 2 A,則電阻甲的電阻值與電池電壓大小應為下列何者? (A) 2Ω,20 V (B) 2Ω,24 V (C) 8Ω,28
- 絕大多數的人類過著群體生活,因此偶有衝突發生,為了化解衝突,產生了許多社會規範。對於社會規範之 描述,請問下列何者正確?甲、維持社會秩序的機制中,道德觀念的起源最早。乙、違反風俗習慣不會受到
- 臺北市上下班時間熱鬧的路上,交叉路口待轉區擠滿了機車騎士。不滿機車強制兩段式左轉,台灣機車路權 促進會近來在臺灣各地集合許多機車騎士發起了「待轉大富翁」行動,在路口繞行表達訴求,希望能廢除強
- 美國2001年總統大選期間,候選人布希(George W. Bush)反對使用墮胎藥。總統大選辯論中,發問者詢問布希,當選後是否會變更已獲國會立法通過的RU486墮胎藥使用權?布希回答:「我在信仰